W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webcrypto@w3.org > February 2013

Re: 3GPP liaison request - possible answer

From: Arun Ranganathan <arun@mozilla.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 16:30:03 -0500
Cc: "'public-webcrypto@w3.org'" <public-webcrypto@w3.org>
Message-Id: <E4E07D1D-1931-4357-BC5D-0DA7A5BD444F@mozilla.com>
To: GALINDO Virginie <Virginie.GALINDO@gemalto.com>
I'm inclined to think of this as not relevant to our work, which focuses on a *web* crypto API, not technologies orthogonal to the scope of the web, and think this is an application layer consideration.  This isn't even a use case we're trying to solve for, unless someone can convince me otherwise.

-- A*

On Feb 6, 2013, at 11:16 AM, GALINDO Virginie wrote:

> Hi all,
>  
> We received in November 2012 a request from 3GPP [1] and I guess that we should consider answering it.
>  
> The 3GPP is asking us to
> -          review their javascript API which is managing some use-case specific keys (actually a GBA key used by mobile network operators to generate some credentials for service providers).
> -          Consider adding their API in our deliverables
>  
> My answers to the questions would be :
> -          Maybe, but we need kind volunteer to read their spec  anyone interested in reading draft Technical Report TR 33.823 section 8.2 [2]
> -          No, this is too much use case specific  any other opinion ?
>  
> Thanks for providing comments to help me to draft an answer taking into account the WG opinion.
>  
> Regards,
> Virginie
>  
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcrypto/2012Nov/0096.html
> [2] http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/archive/33_series/33.823/33823-c00.zip
Received on Thursday, 7 February 2013 21:30:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 7 February 2013 21:30:40 GMT