W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webcrypto@w3.org > May 2012

RE: [W3C Web Crypto WG] - agenda for 21st of May 2012

From: GALINDO Virginie <Virginie.GALINDO@gemalto.com>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 18:25:28 +0200
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
CC: "public-webcrypto@w3.org" <public-webcrypto@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1126F161F6F1B24FABD92B850CAFBD6E011533EE54DD@CROEXCFWP04.gemalto.com>
Hi Eric,

- Audit : was intended to be a discovery mechanism. 
- Your comments : will try to take into account during the call if you do not show up. 
- F2F date : depending on participants availability, I may suggest another date in august. 

Feel free to comment the minutes once available. 


-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Rescorla [mailto:ekr@rtfm.com] 
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 6:20 PM
To: GALINDO Virginie
Cc: public-webcrypto@w3.org
Subject: Re: [W3C Web Crypto WG] - agenda for 21st of May 2012

I seem to have a conflict today, so I will be late if I am on the call at all. I've sent some comments to the list...

On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 7:12 AM, GALINDO Virginie <Virginie.GALINDO@gemalto.com> wrote:

> See proposal and comments 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcrypto/2012May/0074.html
> ==> PROPOSED RESOLUTION : the API will implement means to audit the 
> environment and gets (a) the list of all supported algorithm and (b) 
> the support of a specific set of algorithm

I don't understand what "audit" means in this setting. Is that different from feature discovery?


> ==> PROPOSED RESOLUTION : Next F2F will be on the week 23 to 27th of July in Vancouver, host to be found.

I, at least, doubt I can make this. As I said, two weeks of standards meetings in a row is a real problem for some people.

Received on Monday, 21 May 2012 16:26:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:17:10 UTC