W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webcgm@w3.org > January 2010

Re: P.S. Re: WebCGM 2.1 Relax NG schema asked Fwd: [Draft] Response to Last Call comment

From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:31:46 +0100
Message-ID: <546c6c1c1001250831t11c0261dj10e33f137f65fd7b@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Cc: public-webcgm@w3.org, public-webcgm-wg@w3.org
Dear Lofton

Thank you very much for the XSD, I will have a look to see if it sync

Is there already a test suite that I can test with regards to the schemas ?

Tell me if I have to join temporarly the WG in order to clear the IP
problems

Regards,

Mohamed

On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>wrote:

> Oops, I meant to include this:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Sep/0013.html
>
> -Lofton.
>
> At 09:18 AM 1/25/2010 -0700, Lofton Henderson wrote:
>
> Dear Mohamed,
>
> I am writing on behalf of the WebCGM WG to acknowledge and thank you for
> your contribution of a draft Relax NG schema for WebCGM 2.1.  We will add
> this to the WG's agenda for future attention.  (Presently, we are focusing
> on the last steps to Recommendation for WebCGM 2.1).
>
> FYI, we have had another contribution, in XML Schema language.  This also
> is on our future agenda, and has not yet received any focused WG attention.
>
> Best Regards,
> -Lofton Henderson.
>
> At 09:43 PM 1/23/2010 +0100, Innovimax SARL wrote:
>
> Dear,
>
> Please find a very rough first contribution to a Relax NG compact schema
> based on the DTD based on the data available here  [1]
>
> Please note that the extension mechanism used here is very similar to the
> one used in the DTD
>
> Please also note that the data typed could be further detailled here
>
> This is supposed to have very similar behaviour as the DTD in terms of
> validation results
>
> It could provide a start for providing more precise validation into next
> edition
>
> Best regards,
>
> Mohamed ZERGAOUI
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/PR-webcgm21-20100114/WebCGM21-XCF.html
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
> wrote: Dear,
>
> Here is a now official exchange on WebCGM (which is also an OASIS and ISO
> Standard)
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Lofton Henderson <
> lofton@rockynet.com> Date: Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 4:06 PM Subject: [Draft]
> Response to Last Call comment To: innovimax@gmail.com Cc:
> public-webcgm@w3.org
>
>
>
>
>
> 1 == moving forward with XML Schema or Relax NG == Sticking to DTD to
> define a XML dialect is neither sufficient neither a way to widespread the
> use of this XML dialect. For that, I ask the WG to consider providing
> normative XML Schema and/or Relax NG schema of the XCF model. It will help
> adoption especially because XCF uses Namespaces.
>
> RESPONSE to your first comment: The WebCGM Working Group (WG) agrees that
> WebCGM could potentially benefit by addition of a normative schema -- XML
> Schema or Relax NG. Unfortunately, this proposal is beyond the scope of
> this 2nd LCWD review, and it is deemed to be too late in the WebCGM 2.1
> development cycle. Ideally, such a proposal would have been included in
> the WebCGM 2.1 Requirements, or before 1st LCWD review at latest. The implementation
> of such a proposal would involve major disruption of the WebCGM 2.1 text
> -- removal of the DTD and complete rewriting of Chapter 4 (at least).
> Since it does not address an error in the specification, or a serious
> defect, or violation of any W3C requirement, the WG believes that the
> proposal should be postponed until a future WebCGM development cycle.
>
> As an interim step, the WG thinks that a non-normative Technical Note, separate
> from the progression of 2.1 WebCGM, might be an interesting approach. The
> WG would also welcome an initial contribution, if you have interest in
> making such. --------------------------- end
> -------------------------------
>
> In case we could add that to our todo list
>
> Regards,
>
> Mohamed
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des
> Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
> http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 
>
>
> --
> Innovimax SARL
> Consulting, Training & XML Development
> 9, impasse des Orteaux
> 75020 Paris
> Tel : +33 9 52 475787
> Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
> http://www.innovimax.fr
> RCS Paris 488.018.631
> SARL au capital de 10.000 
> Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="xcf.rnc"
> Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="xcf.rnc"
> X-Attachment-Id: f_g4sva6ls0
>
>


-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 
Received on Monday, 25 January 2010 16:32:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 25 January 2010 16:32:28 GMT