W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webcgm-wg@w3.org > January 2009

Re: Typo in stroke-type style property

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:07:42 -0700
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20090108175904.03844880@localhost>
To: "WebCGM WG" <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
Dave,

Thanks, that's *really* useful.

So I would guess that Benoit's question would be settled if the text is 
just corrected to remove the stroke-type contradiction, and for all the 
rest to clarify what are valid values (and make sure that "corresponds 
to..." is not confused with valid values.)

Note -- I am starting to work toward a new Working Draft that reflects all 
LC resolutions.  That will be our baseline documents for new, post-LC 
improvements as the implementors discover them.  I will try to get a 
editor's draft of the new WD posted by mid-week next week.

-Lofton.

At 02:10 PM 1/8/2009 -0800, David Cruikshank wrote:
>According to the minutes of the f2f meeting in Needham 
>(<http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/28523/f2f_meeting_minutes_may_2008.pdf>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/28523/f2f_meeting_minutes_may_2008.pdf), 
>here's what we said about style properties issues:
>
>
>Style property issues
>
>    * stroke-type
>Resolution: Allow line types 1-15, plus negatives.  A reference to an 
>undefined negative has no effect. Use numbers for all the indices, instead 
>of names.
>    * fill-style
>Resolution: Use integers. Note: The name should be interior-style.
>    * hatch-type
>Resolution: Allow negative values.  Note: The name should be hatch-index
>    * pattern-type
>Resolution: The user would need some knowledge of pattern table to use 
>it.  Note: The name should be pattern-index
>    * fill-offset: Resolution: The name should be fill-referencepoint
>
>
>Hope this clarifies....
>
>Dave
>On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 7:59 AM, Bezaire, Benoit 
><<mailto:bbezaire@ptc.com>bbezaire@ptc.com> wrote:
>>I'm reading the on the new style properties, and I see some inconsistencies.
>>
>>It's unclear with the current spec which style properties are set by a 
>>name or integer value. At the moment it seems like stroke-type can be set 
>>using "solid" or "1". But other style properties like interior-style and 
>>hatch-index only seem to be settable using it's integer value. I think 
>>some clarification and consistency is needed.
>>
>>While it's still unclear if PTC will implement getStyleProperty(), I 
>>wonder if the implementation has to return the exact same string that was 
>>used to set the attribute.
>>
>>Example for stroke-type: setStyleProperty("stroke-type", "solid"), 
>>getStyleProperty("stroke-type") returns 1.
>>Example for stroke-weight: setStyleProperty("stroke-weight", "200%"), 
>>getStyleProperty("stroke-weight") returns 0.5 (assuming original was 0.25).
>>
>>Thoughts?
>>Benoit.
>>
>>
>>----------
>>From: Bezaire, Benoit
>>Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 10:26 AM
>>To: WebCGM WG
>>Subject: Typo in stroke-type style property
>>
>>Current wording says: "[...] Valid values are: integers 1-6 (which 
>>correspond to solid, dash, dot, dash-dot, dash-dot-dot)", the "1-6" 
>>should be replaced by "1-5".
>>
>>Benoit.
>>
>
Received on Friday, 9 January 2009 01:08:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 9 January 2009 01:08:45 GMT