W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webcgm-wg@w3.org > December 2009

Re: Wednesday's scheduled WG telecon

From: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 11:06:26 +0100
Message-ID: <4B28B122.3060805@w3.org>
To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
CC: WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
Lofton,


This afternoon I have an appointment, I may be back for the telecon but 
not 100% sure.

I suggest that I call you latter today (18:00Z) (2 hours after the 
normal telecon slot) if that is doable for you.

Or let me know a slot today after 18:00Z that fits you.
Also please remind me your tel number.

Thierry

Lofton Henderson wrote:
> Thierry -- If you are able to dial in, I think it would be a good idea 
> if at least you and I converse during the telecon slot (11am ET), just 
> to firm up the PR-advancement plan and make sure we haven't overlooked 
> something. Does that sound okay?
> 
> All -- you are welcome to join; it is mainly going to be a matter of 
> deciding the action items for Thierry and I, with dates, etc.
> 
> Logistics
> ----------
> Zakim bridge +1 617-761-6200 (US) or +33.4.89.06.34.99 (France)
> code: 932246 ("WEBCGM")
> IRC, channel #webcgm
> _http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/Group/Overview.html
> 
> _Answering the rest of your questions, in-line...
> 
> At 07:19 PM 12/15/2009 +0100, Thierry Michel wrote:
>> Lofton Henderson wrote:
>>> All --
>>> My bad, we did already resolve to advance:
>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2009Nov/0010.html
>>
>>
>> OK, we are all set then. So we need to work on the final PR document
> 
> It is all finished except that I need to move your cover page into the 
> directory with the rest of the files (../current-editor-21/..)
> 
> 
>> Here is the cover page I had edited.
>> http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/2009/WebCGM21/PR/
>>
>> Please check the removed features. 
> 
> The "removed features" is correct.
> 
>> Does this conforms to the matrix of implementation. 
> 
> I have not yet removed the associated tests from the matrix.  (I need to 
> do so.)
> 
>> Is tha matrix up to date ? any new testcases passed ?
> 
> I updated the matrix last week.  It accurately reflects the current 
> status of the implementations, according to the implementors.
> 
> 
>> Are these features removed from the spec ?
> 
> Yes, I have already removed them.
> 
> -Lofton.
Received on Wednesday, 16 December 2009 10:06:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 16 December 2009 10:06:52 GMT