W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webcgm-wg@w3.org > December 2008

Re: question to I18N about normalization forms

From: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 23:54:26 +0100
Message-ID: <49498322.4090302@w3.org>
To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
CC: WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>

Lofton,


Great catch Lofton, it seems Google is a much better archive for 
tracking Last Call comment than W3C is ;-)

I did not get any response from I18N.

But their email was sent to <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
but was not sent to <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org> nor <public-webcgm@w3.org>

therefore we could not be aware of their response.


I will investigate.


Henderson wrote:
> 
> Hi All --
> 
> Remember some time ago, we asked "which form" (of the four normalization 
> forms)?
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2008Dec/0010.html
> 
> I never saw any answer.  Did any of you?  However, Google exposed this:
> [2] 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-core/2008OctDec/0130.html
> 
> It looks like there was an intent to answer. but I never saw it.  
> Looking at that i18n archive, it appears that it was discussed and 
> approved, but not sent to us on any archived list that I can find. 
> (Perhaps it is because my question [1] copied WebCGM's WG list, not our 
> public list?)
> 
> In any case, "NFC" is appears to be the answer as the generally 
> preferred form for these sorts of activities, which is the same as 
> Stuart concluded.
> 
> Regards,
> -Lofton.
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 17 December 2008 22:55:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 17 December 2008 22:55:29 GMT