- From: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 15:20:08 +0200
- To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- CC: WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>, Don <don@cgmlarson.com>, David Cruikshank <dvdcruikshank@gmail.com>
> I think I favor the latter approach. We list the dependent groups
> ("...in the Charter.") We add after the listing something like: "Note
> that the Charter identifies the principal dependency with SVG and SMIL
> as concerning (declarative) animation, which is effectively a MAY in the
> requirements. It is now dropped from the scope of 2.1. The WebCGM WG
> of course still welcomes input from all groups."
>
> What do you think? (Comments anyone?)
Looks good.
>
> -Lofton.
>
Received on Friday, 29 August 2008 13:20:57 UTC