Re: Fwd: [Draft] Pre announcement for WebCGM 2.1 to a First Public and Last Call Working Draft.

> I think I favor the latter approach.  We list the dependent groups 
> ("...in the Charter.") We add after the listing something like:  "Note 
> that the Charter identifies the principal dependency with SVG and SMIL 
> as concerning (declarative) animation, which is effectively a MAY in the 
> requirements.  It is now dropped from the scope of 2.1.  The WebCGM WG 
> of course still welcomes input from all groups."
> 
> What do you think?  (Comments anyone?)

Looks good.
> 
> -Lofton.
>