Re: WebCGM 2 Acknowledgements section

I agree that Chris & Thierry should be in the Ack's -- a simple oversight.

I agree that it would be nice to list the others, if that is considered 
appropriate and per W3C practice.  As I am editing today, please let me 
know -- should I just list the names, or should I include the parenthetical 
association after the name?  (Recall that these Acks will be in both the 
W3C version and OASIS version, so a W3C reading context should not be assumed.)

-Lofton.

At 11:35 AM 1/17/2007 +0100, Chris Lilley wrote:
>On Wednesday, January 17, 2007, 10:23:14 AM, Thierry wrote:
>
>
>TM> Lofton,
>
>TM> Looking at the WebCGM 2.0 Acknowledgements section [1] I see that Chris
>TM> Lilley and I are not listed.
>TM> Could you please add our two names ?
>
>The text says:
>
>   In addition to the listed editors of this specification, the
>   following individuals have contributed significantly to the present
>   WebCGM specification:
>
>so Lofton, you are already covered as an editor.
>
>I agree that I'm not listed at all, and should be in the
>Acknowledgements. I wonder if we should also add (reasons in
>parentheses) the following people:
>
>(for WAI comments)
>Kentarou Fukuda, IBM
>Al Gilman, Invited Expert
>
>(for I18N comments)
>Felix Sasaki, W3C
>
>
>
>TM> [1]
>TM> 
>http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/Group/2006/REC-webcgm20-20070115/WebCGM20-Appendix.html
>
>
>
>
>--
>  Chris Lilley                    mailto:chris@w3.org
>  Interaction Domain Leader
>  Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
>  W3C Graphics Activity Lead
>  Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG

Received on Wednesday, 17 January 2007 16:36:21 UTC