Re: Approuving WebCGM 2.0 Transition to REC

Lofton Henderson wrote:


> 
> If all details of the text is not finished by the end of today, what 
> would you suggest then:
> 
> 1.)  either postpone the telecon till 1/25?

I should have the call next monday or tuesday, but I need to send the 
Transition Request ahead of time (process says one week prior to the call)
> 
> 2.) or, approve what is done, conditional upon the application of any 
> further needed changes (like the URI of the OS spec, which is still not 
> available.)?

I guess the URI of the OS spec issue should be OK.

But we should finalize the last edits.
Do you want me to do it ?

> 
> 
>> Also I need to send an URI of the REC document for the transition 
>> Request Call [1] (here again a finalized document would be appreciated.
>>
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/08/transition?docstatus=rec-tr
> 
> I had not realized that a transition telecon with the Director was 
> required.

It is mandatory for any Transition.
It should be straight forward.


> 
> -Lofton.
> 
> 
> 

Received on Wednesday, 17 January 2007 15:35:47 UTC