another new version of draft 1.0 errata

I put a fair amount of work into it, and hopefully it's getting in decent 
shape for discussion purposes...

http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2007/errata-10/WebCGM10-errata-20070621.html

E04 and E05 are a bit rough yet, but even those should have enough detail 
to understand the basic issue and proposal.

Some issues have surfaced.  Have a look at E02, for example -- it is more 
complicated than it originally appeared.  Note also that I've started to 
raise questions (e.g., in E01) that are process related, and what we have 
to do to put it in process-acceptable form.

(Proper process alignment and document format is the last step, after we 
sort out the substance of the errata, but it doesn't hurt to start looking 
at it now.

Regards,
-Lofton.