W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webcgm-wg@w3.org > April 2007

AW: telecon Thursday?

From: Dieter Weidenbrueck <dieter@itedo.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 19:42:37 +0200
To: "'Lofton Henderson'" <lofton@rockynet.com>, "WebCGM WG" <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <001201c77c60$cc2c2be0$3e30fd84@itedo.local>

Hi Lofton,

I second your opinion/concerns.
However, I will take Thu+Fri off this, so I won't be available
for a call.

In general I don't feel that there is enough momentum in the group
right now, otherwise they would respond.


> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: public-webcgm-wg-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-webcgm-wg-request@w3.org] Im Auftrag von 
> Lofton Henderson
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 11. April 2007 20:37
> An: WebCGM WG
> Betreff: telecon Thursday?
> Hi,
> How do people feel about a Thursday AM telecon?
> Continuing the recent trend, it has been quiet on email, and 
> there isn't much active business.  Pending business includes...
> Errata:
> -----
> The OASIS 15 day ballot is in progress.  Chris has been asked 
> to move the W3C errata file to replace the dummy that is 
> currently referenced from the Rec WebCGM 2.0 Status section.
> Future:
> -----
> The ball is in CGMO-OASIS WebCGM TC court still.  There will 
> not likely be a late May meeting of the TC.  But it is 
> searching for a summer meeting date.  There is interest in 
> further work, but requirements need to be firmed, scope 
> decided, and technical work launched.
> Long story short ... if the TC (where most of the energy and 
> all of the funding resides) decide NOT to proceed, then the 
> WG likely won't have a future beyond finishing any errata 
> work.  If the TC proceeds, then the WG might have a useful 
> future, along the lines of the 2.0 collaboration.
> Regards,
> -Lofton.
Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2007 17:42:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:19:10 GMT