First, about schedule: can we agree that WG comments should be received and resolved by, e.g., mid-Wednesday? Then we can send our current best cut to Al for WAI endorsement or suggestions. Closure on final text of appendix E: Thursday telecon. Second, a suggestion for last sentence: s/These mechanisms should be used to/Use of these mechanisms will/ (...since "should" is already used in previous sentence). -Lofton. At 09:00 AM 9/26/2006 -0700, Galt, Stuart A wrote: >Hello all, > >Here is a cut at the paragraph talking about style properties. > > > >E.4 Styling > > > >WebCGM 2.0 supports transient, display-time control of a number of display >properties of objects. These can be manipulated via the WebCGM DOM, and >are also available via the XCF mechanism. An adaptive WebCGM 2.0 viewer >should provide some user control of rendering, and in a sense, an >(external) XCF could function similarly to an external style sheet. These >mechanisms should be used to at least partially realize the >recommendations of >[<http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2006/WebCGM20-Intro.html#WCAG10>WCAG10], ><http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/#tech-style-sheets>Checkpoint 3.3 and >[<http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2006/WebCGM20-Intro.html#UAAG10>UAAG10], ><http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-USERAGENT/guidelines.html#gl-user-control-styles>Guideline >4. > >Any comments? > > >-- >Stuart Galt >SGML Resource Group >stuart.a.galt@boeing.com >(206) 544-3656Received on Tuesday, 26 September 2006 17:15:56 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:19:09 GMT