- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:42:48 -0600
- To: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
- Cc: WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
At 06:22 PM 9/26/2006 +0200, Thierry MICHEL wrote: >[...] >Good news for miter limit and pattern size. > >If we want to have "text-on-path" to remain in the PR version, we need to >have another implementation passing it > >SDI Reader has "Partially implemented,could be finished if necessary". > > >Does System Development Inc plans to finish it by mid october (before we >move to PR ? There is a CGMO telecon Wednesday AM. We can discuss then, if SDI (Forrest) is present. -Lofton. > Henderson wrote: >>All, >>I have summarized (attached) the various reports about the three at-risk >>items. Apparently... >>-- miter limit and pattern size are OK now. >>-- text-on-path is still in doubt. > > > > > > > >>-Lofton. >>------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> WebCGM 2.0 "at risk" Status Matrix >> >>Item At Risk IsoView VizEx SDI >>Reader MetaWeb Comments >>miter limit Patrial, for default uses OS value, >>no plans to change that. Ok Ok ??? MetaScript for sure, >>maybe MetaWeb also >>pattern size Partial, progressing. Ok ???OK-ish, but compensating >>for patterns that underflow 1-bit-per-pixel Ok >>text-on-path No plans to implement before CR Ok Partially >>implemented, >>could be finished if necessary. (status & plans unknown.) >> >> Implementations >>Company Name** Product Version Platform >>Itedo Software IsoView IsoView 6.0 Windows XP >>Larson Software Technology VizEx VizEx 1 or 2 Windows XP >>System Development Inc SDI Reader SDI >>Reader 1.04.05 Windows XP >>Ematek GmbH MetaWeb MetaWeb 3.0 Windows XP >>** Nickname used for the viewer in the below tables (to distinguish >>multiple viewers from a Company). > > >-- >Thierry Michel >W3C > > >
Received on Tuesday, 26 September 2006 17:42:40 UTC