W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webcgm-wg@w3.org > December 2006

Re: FW: Chapter 7.3.2 in S1000D Issue 2.3

From: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 19:02:34 +0100
Message-ID: <45897ABA.8010903@w3.org>
To: "Cruikshank, David W" <david.w.cruikshank@boeing.com>
CC: lofton@rockynet.com, WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>


I had installed a draft version of of REC here
http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/Group/2006/REC-webcgm20-20070115/

The changes I have done in the version only apply to the cover page.
Lofton needs to adds some update I believe (appendix D1, etc.).

The stable URL of the final Spec, I do not know it, it will be based on 
the date of publication.

  If you need to introduce something into the sopec -  S1000D Issue 2.3 
, you should do it at the above URL and keep Lofton informed of you 
edits to track these in our "changes appendix".

Thx,
Thierry.




Cruikshank, David W wrote:
>  
> Any chance we would know the stable url of WebCGM 2.0 prior to actual
> publishing?  We are in a position where we need to insert something into
> S1000D Issue 2.3.
> 
> Thx....Dave Cruikshank
> 
> Technical Fellow - Graphics/Digital Data Interchange
> Boeing Commercial Airplane
> 206.544.3560, fax 206.662.3734
> david.w.cruikshank@boeing.com
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zimmermann, Peter E. [mailto:Peter.E.Zimmermann@eads.com] 
> Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 6:19 AM
> To: Cruikshank, David W
> Subject: RE: Chapter 7.3.2 in S1000D Issue 2.3
> 
> Dave,
> 
> Is there a chance to push at least the W3C guys a bit?
> 
> Regards,
> Peter. 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cruikshank, David W [mailto:david.w.cruikshank@boeing.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 7:37 PM
> To: Zimmermann, Peter E.
> Subject: RE: Chapter 7.3.2 in S1000D Issue 2.3
> 
> Thanks Peter,
> 
> WebCGM 2.0 as cleared the PR stage in W3C.  I think right after the 1st
> of the year it will be published as REC.
> 
> The OASIS balloting for WebCGM OS runs from Dec 16th through the end of
> Dec.
> 
> Thx...Dave 
> 
> 
> Technical Fellow - Graphics/Digital Data Interchange Boeing Commercial
> Airplane 206.544.3560, fax 206.662.3734 david.w.cruikshank@boeing.com
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zimmermann, Peter E. [mailto:Peter.E.Zimmermann@eads.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 9:46 AM
> To: Cruikshank, David W
> Subject: RE: Chapter 7.3.2 in S1000D Issue 2.3
> 
> Thanks Dave.
> 
> I will update Chap 7.3.2 in accordance with your comments.
> When do you think WebCGM 2.0 will become a W3C REC?
> 
> Outstanding also (I believe): Valid S1000D XML Schema for companion
> files. 
> Will you provide a final valid version to Nico and me? When?
> 
> Regards,
> Peter. 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cruikshank, David W [mailto:david.w.cruikshank@boeing.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 11:34 PM
> To: Zimmermann, Peter E.
> Subject: RE: Chapter 7.3.2 in S1000D Issue 2.3
> 
> Peter,
> 
> Denis has good points here...I'll address them her and then go into the
> forum site and proposd editing for the chapter.
> 
> 1) is the use of the XCF a project decision or mandatory?
> 
> 	I think it's a project decision
>  
> 2) are the mapping rules (eg Table 5, XCF mapping of element <hotspot>)
> project decisions (each rule) or mandatory?
> 
> 	Project decision
> 
> 3) Be careful,
> <!ATTLIST webcgm
>    ...
>    pictureVisibility (on | off) "on" #IMPLIED
>    ...
>  >
> is not valid (several occurrences of such constructions) XML DTD
> construct
> 
> 	Agreed, this is something that you and I edited into the chapter
> without really thinking about it.  The WebCGM 2.0 spec has the correct
> initial values and behaviors for all of these defined.  They shouldn't
> be here, nor in the XCF DTD.
> 
> 4) Please also check that 2 attributes of type ID on the same element is
> allowed by XML or by the Schemas (if i remember correctly it is not
> valid in pure SGML).
> 
> 	Agreed.  The S1000D:id should be CDATA.
> 
> Thx....Dave Cruikshank
> 
> Technical Fellow - Graphics/Digital Data Interchange Boeing Commercial
> Airplane 206.544.3560, fax 206.662.3734 david.w.cruikshank@boeing.com
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zimmermann, Peter E. [mailto:Peter.E.Zimmermann@eads.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 2:51 PM
> To: Cruikshank, David W
> Subject: WG: Chapter 7.3.2 in S1000D Issue 2.3
> 
> Dave, would you please give us some answers. Thanks, Peter. 
> Regards,
> Peter Zimmermann
> Expert ILS Process Standards
> 
> EADS
> Military Air Systems
> Technical Publications - PSCG2
> 81663 Munich - Germany
> Phone: +49 (0) 89.6 07-2 17 38
> Fax: +49 (0) 89.607-2 18 75
> Mobile: +49 (0) 151.16 86 35 14
> E-mail: Peter.E.Zimmermann@eads.com
> 
> NOTICE: This message, together with any attachments, may contain
> privileged and/or confidential information. If you have received this
> e-mail in error or are not an intended recipient, you may not use,
> reproduce, disseminate or distribute it; do not open nor save any
> attachments, delete it immediately from your system and notify the
> sender promptly by e-mail that you have done so. Thank you.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Excoffier, Denis
> To: Zimmermann, Peter E.
> CC: Excoffier, Denis; Deschamp, Bernard
> Sent: Wed Dec 06 18:04:19 2006
> Subject: Chapter 7.3.2 in S1000D Issue 2.3
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I had a look into your chapter 7.3.2 Issue 003 Inwork 53 and now, a few
> questions/remarks:
> 
> 
> 1) is the use of the XCF a project decision or mandatory?
> 
> 2) are the mapping rules (eg Table 5, XCF mapping of element <hotspot>)
> project decisions (each rule) or mandatory?
> 
> 3) Be careful,
> <!ATTLIST webcgm
>    ...
>    pictureVisibility (on | off) "on" #IMPLIED
>    ...
>  >
> is not valid (several occurrences of such constructions) XML DTD
> construct
> 
> 4) Please also check that 2 attributes of type ID on the same element is
> allowed by XML or by the Schemas (if i remember correctly it is not
> valid in pure SGML).
> 
> Regards.
> 
> Denis Excoffier.
Received on Wednesday, 20 December 2006 18:02:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:19:09 GMT