W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webcgm-wg@w3.org > December 2006

[Minutes] WebCGM Telecon 2006-12-07

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 18:27:39 -0700
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20061207182302.03f3cb80@localhost>
To: WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>


WebCGM WG --

The minutes are at

http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/Minutes/2006/12/07-webcgm-minutes.html

and also available as text, below.

    [1]W3C

       [1] http://www.w3.org/

                                - DRAFT -

                                WebCGM WG

                               7 Dec 2006

    [2]Agenda

       [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2006Dec/0001

    See also: [3]IRC log

       [3] http://www.w3.org/2006/12/07-webcgm-irc

Attendees

    Present
           Lofton, Dave, Stuart

    Regrets
           Thierry, Dieter, Benoit

    Absent
           Don, Chris

    Chair
           Lofton

    Scribe
           Dave

Contents

      * [4]Topics
          1. [5]roll call 11:00am ET, membership, agenda
          2. [6]routine WG business
          3. [7]report on spec status in OASIS
          4. [8]report on spec status in W3C
          5. [9]Press Release and Testimonials
          6. [10]Future work in WG
          7. [11]Do we plan to have another F2F?
      * [12]Summary of Action Items
      _________________________________________________________



    <scribe> Scribe: Dave

    <lofton> zakim this is WebCGM

roll call 11:00am ET, membership, agenda

routine WG business

    none

report on spec status in OASIS

    <lofton> (On roll call -- no quorum)

    2 week OASIS review has started

    <lofton> OS ballot starts on Dec 16th

report on spec status in W3C

    <lofton> According to Thierry, all was positive.

Press Release and Testimonials

    <lofton> It's in the hands of Carol and Janet, and we have no
    further information.

Future work in WG

    <lofton> I suggest that we postpone this till we have a quorum,
    except...

    see:
    [13]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2006Nov/002
    6.html

      [13] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2006Nov/0026.html

    <lofton> what do we three think about "supersede"?

    <lofton> Agreed: 2.0 does NOT supersede 1.0. Thierry (in email)
    agreed with this.

    <lofton> Postpone rest of this topic till later.

Do we plan to have another F2F?

    <lofton> What WG work is there that would suggest a F2F?

    <lofton> (Need to answer that question first -- email dialog
    needed.)

    Ajourned: 11:25 EST

Summary of Action Items

    [End of minutes]
      _________________________________________________________


     Minutes formatted by David Booth's [14]scribe.perl version 1.127
     ([15]CVS log)
     $Date: 2006/12/08 01:25:08 $
      _________________________________________________________

      [14] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
      [15] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Friday, 8 December 2006 01:27:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:19:09 GMT