Re: initializing working draft specs in github.com/webauthn?

Hi Richard,

I was going to give the merge a shot. Yes - a simple concat (perhaps
pooling all the intros together, and moving the extensions from the
signature spec out toward the end, but nothing more than that), and as a PR
and then ask the list what they thought. I probably won't get to it until
the weekend, though.

Jeff - I wasn't planning on moving from respec to bikeshed. If we want to
do that, maybe in a separate step?

Dirk.


On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:45 PM Richard Barnes <rbarnes@mozilla.com> wrote:

> Could the Google folks who are doing the merge please raise their hands?
>
> And please illuminate us as to what you're planning to do in this merge?
> My hope is that it's just the simple "copy everything into one file" merge
> and not anything that would change the content.
>
> And please use a PR for this so that the group has a chance to review.
>
> And please give a bit more advance notice to the whole group next time,
> instead of just one chair ;)
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Anthony Nadalin <tonynad@microsoft.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Google folks have committed to do the merge of the 3 specifications into
>> one specification, so PLEASE DO NOT MAKE ANY CHANGES TO THE SPECIFICATIONS
>> IN GITHUB UNTIL THE MERGE IS DONE.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Hodges, Jeff [mailto:jeff.hodges@paypal.com]
>> *Sent:* Friday, March 4, 2016 3:54 PM
>> *To:* Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
>> *Cc:* public-webauthn@w3.org
>> *Subject:* Re: initializing working draft specs in github.com/webauthn?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>>
>> On 03/04/2016 05:55 PM, Hodges, Jeff wrote:
>>
>> Someone will be placing the sources for..
>>
>>
>>
>> https://www.w3.org/Submission/2015/SUBM-fido-web-api-20151120/
>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2fwww.w3.org%2fSubmission%2f2015%2fSUBM-fido-web-api-20151120%2f&data=01%7c01%7ctonynad%40microsoft.com%7c9b1e5cd1d8814f85f08708d34488618f%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=GIHExVa6AhY8pHqAZpV7yldSqNJvLk17CHpaabIBJQ8%3d>
>>
>> https://www.w3.org/Submission/2015/SUBM-fido-key-attestation-20151120/
>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2fwww.w3.org%2fSubmission%2f2015%2fSUBM-fido-key-attestation-20151120%2f&data=01%7c01%7ctonynad%40microsoft.com%7c9b1e5cd1d8814f85f08708d34488618f%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=QaYdNyYxxhUg%2fmq9V81f8em3jCemFN9%2ffY0DjpkaECY%3d>
>>
>>
>> https://www.w3.org/Submission/2015/SUBM-fido-signature-format-20151120/#overview
>> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2fwww.w3.org%2fSubmission%2f2015%2fSUBM-fido-signature-format-20151120%2f%23overview&data=01%7c01%7ctonynad%40microsoft.com%7c9b1e5cd1d8814f85f08708d34488618f%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=t41T%2bOwme%2bCdWgA8hFLzImugvyyc9FW5bA%2bGx97uqfM%3d>
>>
>>
>>
>> ..into github.com/webauthn?
>>
>>
>> Done, with a s/SUBM-fido/webauthn.
>>
>> I will change the CR styles later, but at least we can open issues for
>> them and do pull requests starting now.
>>
>>   cheers,
>>      harry
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> thx,
>>
>>
>>
>> =JeffH
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 8 March 2016 06:14:44 UTC