Re: Representation of a secondary resource?

On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 14:47, Dan Connolly wrote:
> > I believe a reference from 3.1 (or 3.1.1) to "details of handling URIs
> > with fragment identifiers, IOW getting representation for secondary
> > resources" pointing to 3.2.1 could solve this, in case that's the way of
> > getting to a representation of a resource via its secondary resource
> > identifier (URI with fragID).
> 
> No, that's not a way of getting a representation of such a resource.

Dan,

in this case I'll be satisfied if section 3.1.1 mentions that it
excludes URIs with fragIDs and section 2.6 notes that this document
doesn't inform the reader on getting representations for secondary
resources, if indeed they have any.

Thanks for the patience with me,

Jacek