Re: HTML WG last call comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-webarch-20040816/

Steven,

At our F2F meeting yesterday, the TAG discussed [1] the HTML WGs comment 
below. The TAG resolved to make the following change around the 
reference to the xlinkScope-23 in Section 4.5.2:

    "RESOLVED: add that XLink is not the only linking design that has 
been proposed for XML, nor is it universally accepted as a good design. 
See also TAG issue xlinkScope-23"

Please could you indicate whether this adequately addresses the HTML 
WG's comment.

Many thanks,

Stuart Williams
On behalf of W3C TAG.
--
[1] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2004Oct/att-0008/mins06.html#item07 

     (then search for "recent comment from HTML WG").



Steven Pemberton wrote:

>
> (Apologies for lateness, due to laptop meltdown and concomitant backlog)
>
> The HTML WG has one comment on the architecture last call:
>
> "XLink is an appropriate specification for representing links in 
> hypertext  XML applications."
>
> We demur. XLink was issued without reaching consensus, and did not 
> follow  due W3C process. This makes it an inappropriate specification 
> for  underpinning the Web architecture until such time as consensus 
> has been  achieved.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Steven Pemberton
> For the HTML WG
>