W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webarch-comments@w3.org > July to September 2004

KD-001 [was: Comments on Web Arch WD - 2004-07-05]

From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 16:27:38 -0400
To: public-webarch-comments@w3.org
Cc: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Message-id: <87y8j06891.fsf@nwalsh.com>
|* KD-001 (picky detail)
|The graphics identified by the URI [1] gives an XML file which is not  
|determined. Is it XHTML 1.0, XHTML 1.1, etc? There's no dtd. It's  
|delivered with application/xhtml+xml, but there's nothing which says  
|what is an XHTML file. I know what's an XHTML 1.0 or an XHTML 1.1.
|It could be an XHTML Family document, but it's unclear if it respects  
|the conformance criteria [2]


I've amended the graphic[3] to include a hint of a doctype to show that
the document does conform to the modularization work. Please let me know
if you're satisfied with the updated diagram.

| [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-webarch-20040705/uri-res-rep.png
| [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xhtml-modularization-20010410/conformance.html#s_conform_document
[3] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/webarch/uri-res-rep.png

                                        Be seeing you,

Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | I don't make predictions. I never have
http://nwalsh.com/            | and I never will.--Tony Blair

Received on Thursday, 23 September 2004 20:27:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:26:47 UTC