W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webappsec@w3.org > June 2012

Re: Proposed resolution of sandbox question

From: Tanvi Vyas <tanvi@mozilla.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 12:31:11 -0700
Message-ID: <4FC9187F.8020909@mozilla.com>
To: public-webappsec@w3.org
On 5/31/12 10:00 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Eric Rescorla<ekr@rtfm.com>  wrote:
>> The chairs would like to propose the following resolution of the sandbox
>> directive:
>>
>> - CSP 1.0 will include the sandbox directive.
>> - The sandbox directive will be marked as an "optional" feature in CSP 1.0
>>   so that an implementation can conform without implementing it
>>   (i.e., it will be exempt from the requirements of S 2.)
>>
>> Is this something people can live with?
> That's fine with me.
>
> Adam
>
Fine with me too.
Received on Friday, 1 June 2012 19:31:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 1 June 2012 19:31:42 GMT