W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webappsec@w3.org > June 2012

Re: Proposed resolution of sandbox question

From: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 22:00:01 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJE5ia9w3oTb7J5uZHdNNUNuPA=qp_-2N3xKnR8M=-KhUwxuNg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Cc: public-webappsec <public-webappsec@w3.org>
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:
> The chairs would like to propose the following resolution of the sandbox
> directive:
>
> - CSP 1.0 will include the sandbox directive.
> - The sandbox directive will be marked as an "optional" feature in CSP 1.0
>  so that an implementation can conform without implementing it
>  (i.e., it will be exempt from the requirements of S 2.)
>
> Is this something people can live with?

That's fine with me.

Adam
Received on Friday, 1 June 2012 05:01:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 1 June 2012 05:01:06 GMT