W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2019

Re: RFC: TPAC meeting structure

From: Léonie Watson <lw@tetralogical.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 16:50:55 +0100
To: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>, Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Cc: "public-editingtf@w3.org" <public-editingtf@w3.org>, Grisha Lyukshin <Grisha.Lyukshin@microsoft.com>, Bo Cupp <pcupp@microsoft.com>
Message-ID: <b8d6b6a7-43b6-a94a-fe3a-52f1a8cc37a9@tetralogical.com>
Hello Travis,

The idea is for different breakout sessions to run in parallel, yes, but 
we won't have separate spaces I'm afraid.

Timing wasn't on our side with TPAC I'm afraid. The request for meeting 
rooms closed in April, and WebApps didn't charter until May. We assumed 
we'd want at least one room, but didn't get much further than that.

The HTML WG was recently able to secure a meeting room for a Web 
Components meeting, so there's no harm in trying our luck for an editing 
meeting too. How many people do you think might participate, and would 
one day be enough?


On 26/07/2019 15:59, Travis Leithead wrote:
> Hi Leonie! Thanks for driving the agenda for TPAC.
> I'd like to request a chunk of time for the Editing TF to meet and 
> review new and existing work; I don't know if that's best done as part 
> of the WebApps block meeting time, or if there is some smaller room for 
> us to meet in (as has been done in the past). I see the agenda 
> <https://github.com/w3c/webappswg/issues/10>has unconference sessions 
> planned--are some of these expected to run in parallel in different 
> spaces? Just curious.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Léonie Watson <lw@tetralogical.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, July 26, 2019 4:24 AM
> *To:* Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk>; public-webapps@w3.org 
> <public-webapps@w3.org>
> *Cc:* public-editingtf@w3.org <public-editingtf@w3.org>
> *Subject:* Re: RFC: TPAC meeting structure
> With the correct Editing TF address this time.
> On 26/07/2019 12:23, Léonie Watson wrote:
>> Everyone,
>> One last request for you to take a look at the proposed meeting 
>> structure for TPAC
>> https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fw3c%2Fwebappswg%2Fissues%2F10&amp;data=02%7C01%7CTravis.Leithead%40microsoft.com%7Ce0002bfd53994c9d6f1908d711bc1994%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636997371896870659&amp;sdata=PRn0MfY5XLWiTCPYswu%2BS5bismeh6qooadZLSiXgrzw%3D&amp;reserved=0
>> If we don't hear anything to the contrary, we'll assume that you're ok 
>> with the proposal.
>> Léonie and Marcos.
>> On 02/06/2019 12:24, Léonie Watson wrote:
>>> For those of you who have yet to join WebApps (and so may not be 
>>> receiving Github notifications from the WG repo), please take a look 
>>> at this proposed meeting structure for TPAC and let us have your 
>>> comments:
>>> https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fw3c%2Fwebappswg%2Fissues%2F10&amp;data=02%7C01%7CTravis.Leithead%40microsoft.com%7Ce0002bfd53994c9d6f1908d711bc1994%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636997371896870659&amp;sdata=PRn0MfY5XLWiTCPYswu%2BS5bismeh6qooadZLSiXgrzw%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>> Thanks
>>> Léonie.
> -- 
> Director @TetraLogical TetraLogical.com

Director @TetraLogical TetraLogical.com
Received on Friday, 26 July 2019 15:51:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 26 July 2019 15:51:24 UTC