- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 06:50:06 -0400
- To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>, WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
On 6/23/14 4:04 PM, Glenn Adams wrote: > What is the plan, i.e., schedule timeline, for moving WebIDL to REC? > We have now a two year old CR that appears to be stuck and a 2nd > Edition that I'm not sure has made it to FPWD. Hi Glenn, All, I don't have any new info re v1 beyond what Boris said a few weeks ago in this thread: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-script-coord/2014AprJun/0162.html>. Cameron, Boris - please reply to Glenn's question. > Given the high degree of dependency from other specs and > implementations on this work, we really need to find a way to wrap up > this work or at least publish something reasonably stable. I think the new(ish) normative reference policy [1] provides some guidance on how to handle this situation (and WebApps has been able to advance several of its specs to REC despite them having a normative reference to Web IDL). Are there specific specs (and Web IDL features) that concern you, Glenn? -Thanks, AB [1] <http://www.w3.org/2013/09/normative-references> > Regards, > Glenn >
Received on Tuesday, 24 June 2014 10:50:35 UTC