On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Scott Miles <sjmiles@google.com> wrote: > My issue is that the target of this link will not in general be an atomic > thing like a 'component' or a 'module'. It's a carrier for resources and > links to other resources. IMO this is one of the great strengths of this > proposal. > > For this reason, when it was rel="components" (plural) there was no > problem for me. > > Having said all that, I'm not particularly up in arms about this issue. > The name will bend to the object in the fullness of time. :) > > > I guess that doesn't bother me because rel="stylesheet" isn't just one stylesheet either, you can @import lots of them down there. :) Similarly when I think of a "component" I don't think of one custom widget, I think of lots of logically related bundled things. - E
Received on Monday, 11 March 2013 23:49:14 UTC