W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: [webcomponents]: Making Shadow DOM Subtrees Traversable

From: Scott González <scott.gonzalez@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 15:14:39 -0500
Message-ID: <CAO8i3ieuxmwb5H5_c+kYp51HNcy7T9cUdio1ran5CUh5L3irnA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bronislav Klučka <Bronislav.Klucka@bauglir.com>
Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 12:03 AM, Bronislav Klučka <
Bronislav.Klucka@bauglir.com> wrote:
>
> On 7.3.2013 19:54, Scott González wrote:
>>
>> Who is killing anything?
>>
> Hi, given
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/**Public/public-webapps/**
> 2013JanMar/0676.html<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2013JanMar/0676.html>
> I've misunderstood your point as advocating against Shadow altogether.
>

Ok, good to know that this was mostly just a miscommunication.



> 2nd is is practical: not having to care about the internals, so I do not
> break it by accident from outside. If the only way to work with internals
> is by explicit request for internals and then working with them, but
> without the ability to breach the barrier accidentally, without the
> explicit request directly on the shadow host, this concern is satisfied and
> yes, there will be no clashes except for control naming.
>

My understanding is that you have to explicitly ask to walk into the
shadow, so this wouldn't happen accidentally. Can someone please confirm or
deny this?
Received on Friday, 8 March 2013 20:15:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:58 GMT