- From: Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org>
- Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 13:51:44 -0700
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > On Fri, 14 Jun 2013, Dirk Schulze wrote: >> >> On Jun 14, 2013, at 6:41 AM, "Robin Berjon" <robin@w3.org> wrote: >> > >> > now that <template> is in HTML, I was wondering if some of the other >> > specs needed the same treatment. >> >> Some of the specs can be relevant for other specifications as well. >> Unless you don't want to integrate the whole web stack (SVG, MathML, >> ...) into the HTML spec, some things should be separated from HTML. > > I think the main deciding factor should be who is going to maintain the > text once in the future. With <template>, presumably that's now us (HTML > spec editors). For most Web component stuff, I assume it's still Dimitri > and company. Thus they should probably stay in separate specs. I think this is a nice rule of thumb. We could then refactor respective specs to better integrate with each other by adding extension points and removing monkeypatches. :DG<
Received on Sunday, 16 June 2013 20:52:12 UTC