- From: Ms2ger <ms2ger@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 16:26:45 +0100
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- CC: public-webapps@w3.org
On 12/02/2012 01:38 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > On 12/1/12 3:34 PM, ext Ms2ger wrote: >> I object to this publication because of this change: >> >> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/rev/2341e31323a4 > > For a couple of years now, if a spec proposed for publication in TR > includes a normative reference that hahas published as a TR, PLH has > insisted the reference needs to be a W3C document (TR or ED). (I'm > pretty sure a small number of references to non W3C documents slipped > through but I consider those mistakes.) > > I asked Jungkee to make the reference changes to the TR versions so > thanks Jungkee for the patch. > > It would be OK with me if the references were changed to W3C EDs. Would > that take care of your objection? No. I'd love to hear from plh why he would not leave decisions like these to the WG. Ms2ger
Received on Sunday, 2 December 2012 15:27:31 UTC