Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29

On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Ms2ger <ms2ger@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 11/27/2012 02:16 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>
>> On 11/27/12 12:21 AM, ext Jungkee Song wrote:
>>
>>> From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com]
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 3:05 AM
>>>>
>>>> I think the next step is for the XHR Editors to create a TR version
>>>> using the WD template so that everyone can see exactly what is being
>>>> proposed for publication as a TR. Please create that version as soon as
>>>> you can so that this CfC can be based on that version (rather than the
>>>> ED) and reply with the URL of the TR version.
>>>>
>>>> (Please use 6 December 2012 as the publication date.)
>>>>
>>> We prepared a proposed TR version at:
>>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/raw-**file/tip/TR/Overview.html<http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/raw-file/tip/TR/Overview.html>
>>>
>>
>> Thanks Jungkee.
>>
>> All - <http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/**raw-file/tip/TR/Overview.html<http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/raw-file/tip/TR/Overview.html>>
>> is the
>> document proposed for publication as a TR and thus is the basis for this
>> CfC.
>>
>
> I object to this publication because of this change:
>
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/rev/**2341e31323a4<http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/rev/2341e31323a4>
>
> pushed with a misleading commit message.
>

since you don't say what is misleading, and since commit messages are
irrelevant for W3C process, this  objection is immaterial