W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist

From: Florian Bösch <pyalot@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 20:11:25 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOK8ODjPqTDRp6WNw6fsscf_DRzauDtNkJi1JcM2t9ghS73umg@mail.gmail.com>
To: João Eiras <joaoe@opera.com>
Cc: Webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
Similarly the vendors deciding not wanting to support WebSQL isn't a spec
issue and it should be filed in the bug tracker of your favorite vendor.


On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 8:02 PM, João Eiras <joaoe@opera.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 19:50:20 +0100, Florian Bösch <pyalot@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>  On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 7:42 PM, João Eiras <joaoe@opera.com> wrote:
>>
>>  You're again confusing implementation details with the specification.
>>> User
>>> agents are free to implement whatever quota management they want, as long
>>> as it's transparent and respects the visible effects on the webpage side.
>>>
>>>  That may be so, it still means WebSQL is universally hard limited
>> without
>> escape to 5mb. So it doesn't really matter if that's what's specced or
>> not,
>> it makes it equally unsuitable for data beyond 5mb.
>>
>
> Again, not a spec issue. Go to your favorite browser bug tracker and make
> a feature request.
>
>
Received on Monday, 12 November 2012 19:11:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:56 GMT