W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: [push-api] Moving Push API to FPWD [Was: Re: [admin] Publishing specs before TPAC: CfC start deadline is Oct 15]

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 07:34:07 -0400
Message-ID: <506EC5AF.9030403@nokia.com>
To: ext Bryan Sullivan <blsaws@gmail.com>
CC: EDUARDO FULLEA CARRERA <efc@tid.es>, "SULLIVAN, BRYAN L" <bs3131@att.com>, "public-webapps@w3c.org" <public-webapps@w3c.org>
On 10/5/12 7:06 AM, ext Bryan Sullivan wrote:
> - more info on serverProtocols

It still seems like the set of valid strings will need to be defined. 
Perhaps at this point, it would be sufficient if a related Issue Block 
was added. (I'll ask Mike to create a Bugzilla component for the spec.)

> - additional references (I still need to update the respec biblio)

Yes, please do as this must be fixed before the FPWD is actually 
published in /TR/. (Robin provided some related info in [1].)

> I would like to request a CFC for FPWD publication, if there are no more
> substantive comments on the updated version.

I will start a CfC for the FPWD.

(If you haven't prepared a doc for publication as a TR, please see 
<http://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/SpecEditing> for some information about 
the PubRules and such.)

-Thanks, AB

[1] <http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/webapps/20121005>


>>>> * serverProtocols - what are the expectations for the "valid" set of
>>>> values; where are they specified?
>>>>
>>> Good question. We need some means of registration of well-known services
>>> so the protocols can be recognized.
>>>
Received on Friday, 5 October 2012 11:34:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:55 GMT