W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2012

Re: Lazy Blob

From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 14:29:33 +0200
Cc: WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, Jungkee Song <jungkee.song@samsung.com>
Message-Id: <05DAA380-7F30-4F39-B66B-87889E1A8CB6@berjon.com>
To: Tobie Langel <tobie@fb.com>
On Aug 2, 2012, at 10:45 , Tobie Langel wrote:
> On 8/1/12 10:04 PM, "Glenn Maynard" <glenn@zewt.org> wrote:
>> Can we please stop saying "lazy blob"?  It's a confused and confusing
>> phrase.  Blobs are "lazy" by design.
> 
> Yes. "Remote blob" is more accurate and should help think about this
> problem in a more meaningful way.

Actually, you need both to be accurate. With the current stack you can have lazy blobs, and you can have remote blobs, but you can't have both at the same time. If we're going to be strict about naming this, we're talking about remote lazy blobs.

-- 
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Thursday, 2 August 2012 12:30:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:54 GMT