W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2012

Re: Lazy Blob

From: Odin Hørthe Omdal <odinho@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 11:02:54 +0200
To: public-webapps@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.wieoq4p449xobu@odinho-fido.oslo.osa>
On Thu, 02 Aug 2012 10:45:03 +0200, Tobie Langel <tobie@fb.com> wrote:

> On 8/1/12 10:04 PM, "Glenn Maynard" <glenn@zewt.org> wrote:
>
>> Can we please stop saying "lazy blob"?  It's a confused and confusing
>> phrase.  Blobs are "lazy" by design.
> Yes. "Remote blob" is more accurate and should help think about this
> problem in a more meaningful way.

Good name, makes it easier to understand why it best applies to transports  
that represent their resource with a URL pointing directly at it.

All this talk about lazy blob was at least confusing me. :-)

-- 
Odin Hørthe Omdal (Velmont/odinho) · Core, Opera Software, http://opera.com
Received on Thursday, 2 August 2012 09:03:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:54 GMT