W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: (aside) MIME type

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 10:20:43 +0100
To: "Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen" <hallvord@opera.com>, "Paul Libbrecht" <paul@hoplahup.net>
Cc: "Ryosuke Niwa" <rniwa@webkit.org>, public-webapps@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.v9vawtdg64w2qv@annevk-macbookpro.local>
On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 10:15:28 +0100, Paul Libbrecht <paul@hoplahup.net>  
wrote:
> WHEN I registered a media-type on the ietf list I have been quite much  
> hit as the first comment "one says media-type nowadays". And indeed MIME  
> is meant for email originally.
>
> So I guess politically media-type is a requirement.
> Should I dig for a formal requirement?

HTML and other specifications use MIME type. Media type is ambiguous with  
CSS.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Saturday, 18 February 2012 09:21:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:50 GMT