W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: Obsolescence notices on old specifications, again

From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 13:01:17 -0700
Message-ID: <CACQ=j+d5Suunem0Bf+Aczza-CMtpG63aAmQ9PmKWxdBH79zGNA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org>
Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Bronislav Klučka <Bronislav.Klucka@bauglir.com>, public-webapps@w3.org
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org> wrote:

> You keep saying this throughout this thread without pointing to specifics.
> It's impossible to argue with broad, sweeping generalizations like this. So
> far, you have yet to point to one concrete organization/statute that cares
> about REC status.
>

Ojan, apparently you are not familiar with international or national
standards bodies. To mention just a couple, ANSI, ISO, and ITU care. I
could give you a list of hundreds if you wish, all having encoded such
rules into their formal processes.
Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2012 20:02:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:50 GMT