W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: Testing Expectations

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:01:17 -0500
Message-ID: <4F0F11DD.7090508@nokia.com>
To: ext Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
CC: ext Glen Shires <gshires@google.com>, olli@pettay.fi, public-webapps@w3.org, public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org, Dan Burnett <dburnett@voxeo.com>, ext Satish S <satish@google.com>, Peter Beverloo <peter@chromium.org>
On 1/12/12 11:06 AM, ext Doug Schepers wrote:
> Hi, folks-
>
> On 1/11/12 9:40 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>> On 1/10/12 11:25 AM, ext Glen Shires wrote:
>>> Per #4 Testing commitment(s): can you elaborate on what you would like
>>> to see at this point?
>>
>> At this point, I think a `warm fuzzy` like "if/when the spec advances to
>> Candidate Recommendation, we will contribute to a test suite that is
>> sufficient to exit the CR" would be useful.
>
> As such, the creation of tests should not be left to CR... 

Yes, good point Doug.

-AB
> there should be a plan in place (e.g. a person, and a loose policy, 
> like "as we implement, we'll make tests and contribute them to the 
> WG"), and a person responsible for collecting and maintaining the 
> tests (i.e. making sure that the tests are adapted to meet the 
> changing spec).
Received on Thursday, 12 January 2012 17:04:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:50 GMT