W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: CfC: publish LCWD of Indexed Database; deadline May 15

From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 09:44:48 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+c2ei-wyhgu-8YS7-6ySqWttm-VpTitYo+ikevBNrUFO48CXg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
I approve!!

/ Jonas

On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 8:29 AM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote:
> As discussed during last week's f2f meeting [Mins], IDB bug 14404 was the
> last remaining bug blocking a LCWD of the spec and the other remaining bugs
> are considered editorial and not blockers for LCWD [Bugz]. Bug 1404 is now
> closed so this is a Call for Consensus to publish a LCWD of IDB using the
> following ED as the basis
> <http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/IndexedDB/raw-file/tip/Overview.html> (it has not yet
> been made "TR pub ready").
>
> This CfC satisfies the group's requirement to "record the group's decision
> to request advancement" for this LCWD. Note the Process Document states the
> following regarding the significance/meaning of a LCWD:
>
> [[
> http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#last-call
>
> Purpose: A Working Group's Last Call announcement is a signal that:
>
> * the Working Group believes that it has satisfied its relevant technical
> requirements (e.g., of the charter or requirements document) in the Working
> Draft;
>
> * the Working Group believes that it has satisfied significant dependencies
> with other groups;
>
> * other groups SHOULD review the document to confirm that these dependencies
> have been satisfied. In general, a Last Call announcement is also a signal
> that the Working Group is planning to advance the technical report to later
> maturity levels.
> ]]
>
> If you have any comments or concerns about this CfC, please send them to
> public-webapps@w3.org by May 15 at the latest. Positive response is
> preferred and encouraged and silence will be considered as agreement with
> the proposal.
>
> The proposed LC review period is 4 weeks.
>
> -Thanks, AB
>
> [Mins] http://www.w3.org/2012/05/02-webapps-minutes.html#item10
> [Bugz] http://tinyurl.com/Bugz-IndexedDB
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 8 May 2012 16:45:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:52 GMT