W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: [websockets] Moving Web Sockets back to LCWD; is 15210 a showstopper?

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 00:56:33 -0700
Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-id: <9688602D-623A-4705-81C5-34D5DF7A5D96@apple.com>
To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>

I think it would be reasonable to defer the feature requested in 15210 to a future version of Web Sockets API. It would also be reasonable to include it if anyone feels strongly. Was a reason cited for why 15210 should be considered critical? I could not find one in the minutes.

Cheers,
Maciej


On May 3, 2012, at 3:41 PM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote:

> During WebApps' May 2 discussion about the Web Sockets API CR, four Sockets API bugs were identified as high priority to fix: 16157, 16708, 16703 and 15210. Immediately after that discussion, Hixie checked in fixes for 16157, 16708 and 16703and these changes will require the spec going back to LC.
> 
> Since 15210 remains open, before I start a CfC for a new LC, I would like some feedback on whether the new LC should be blocked until 15210 is fixed, or if we should move toward a new LC without the fix (and thus consider 15210 for the next version of the spec). If you have any comments, please send them by May 10.
> 
> -AB
> 
> [Mins] http://www.w3.org/2012/05/02-webapps-minutes.html#item08
> [CR] http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/CR-websockets-20111208/
> [Bugz] http://tinyurl.com/Bugz-Web-Socket-API
> [15210] https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15210
> 
Received on Tuesday, 8 May 2012 07:57:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:52 GMT