- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 16:20:31 +0100
- To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Cc: WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
* Glenn Adams wrote: >What do you mean by "treat content that clearly is UTF-32 as >UTF-16-encoded"? Do you mean interpreting it as a sequence of unsigned >shorts? That would be a direct violation of the semantics of UTF-32, would >it not? Consider you have ... Content-Type: example/example;charset=utf-32 FF FE 00 00 ... Some would like to treat this as UTF-16 encoded document starting with U+0000 after the Unicode signature, even though it clearly is UTF-32. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Monday, 5 December 2011 15:21:07 UTC