W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2011

[Bug 14037] Should XMLDocument be standardized?

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 04:35:49 +0000
To: public-webapps@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1R0nO1-0003Ty-Ez@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14037

Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |annevk@opera.com,
                   |                            |ap@webkit.org,
                   |                            |ian@hixie.ch,
                   |                            |jonas@sicking.cc,
                   |                            |mjs@apple.com,
                   |                            |Ms2ger@gmail.com,
                   |                            |public-webapps@w3.org,
                   |                            |roc@ocallahan.org,
                   |                            |simonp@opera.com
          Component|HTML5 spec (editor: Ian     |DOM Parsing and
                   |Hickson)                    |Serialization
            Product|HTML WG                     |WebAppsWG
          QAContact|public-html-bugzilla@w3.org |member-webapi-cvs@w3.org
           Severity|normal                      |blocker

--- Comment #1 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2011-09-06 04:35:48 UTC ---
(Note: We'd like to get this fixed within the next two weeks so that Gecko
doesn't have to back out the patch unifying event handlers.)

cc'ed usual suspects; please cc more.

The only option I can see is to make window.XMLDocument an object that isn't a
Document. Do people depend on Document objects having XMLDocument somewhere in
their prototype?

It would help to have a better idea of what people are doing with this object.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 6 September 2011 04:35:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:47 GMT