W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: [XHR2] Blobs, names and FormData

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 10:33:43 +0200
To: "Charles Pritchard" <chuck@jumis.com>
Cc: "WebApps WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.v0pl2hx864w2qv@annevk-macbookpro.local>
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 20:44:15 +0200, Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>  
wrote:
> Is there any interest in supporting application/x-www-form-urlencoded ?
>
> It would of course lose any carried content types or file names from  
> Blobs. urlencoding is certainly inefficient, and it's something that can  
> be done in JS as things currently stand.
> It would help to send urlencoded posts to services that don't support  
> multipart.

Examples of such services would be useful here. (That would still accept  
urlencoded files.)


> Prpoposed:
>
> FormData output with the x-www-form-urlencoded mime type:
> formData.toUrlEncodedBlob(xhr.send)
>
> If going down the blob path, these two would have the same end-result:
> formData.toMultipartBlob(xhr.send)
> xhr.send(formData);

What kind of API-style is this?


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 24 August 2011 08:34:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:47 GMT