W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: RfC: LCWD of Progress Events; deadline September 1

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 14:05:32 +0200
To: public-webapps@w3.org, "Cyril Concolato" <cyril.concolato@telecom-paristech.fr>
Message-ID: <op.vz7c7ioc64w2qv@annevk-macbookpro.local>
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 09:36:33 +0200, Cyril Concolato  
<cyril.concolato@telecom-paristech.fr> wrote:
> Le 09/08/2011 19:34, Arthur Barstow a écrit :
>> On August 9, WebApps published LCWD #2 of the Progress Events spec:
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-progress-events-20110809/
> Section 2.1:
> "If this is for some reason not possible prefix the extension in some  
> way and start the prefix with an uppercase letter. E.g. if company Foo  
> wants to add a private method bar() it could be named FooBar() to  
> prevent clashes with a potential future standardized bar()."
> This sentence in hard to read and unclear. Please rephrase/fix it.

Suggestions?


> Section 4.2:
> It  should indicate what the requirements for other specifications are  
> to define properly the use of these events.

There are no requirements.


> Section 4.3:
> Why aren't the names of events, and the instant and number of times they  
> are dispatched, not normatively defined ? This would be beneficial for  
> consistency in the web platform, wouldn't it?

Because it very much depends on the context.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Sunday, 14 August 2011 12:06:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:47 GMT