- From: Cyril Concolato <cyril.concolato@telecom-paristech.fr>
- Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 09:36:33 +0200
- To: public-webapps@w3.org
Le 09/08/2011 19:34, Arthur Barstow a écrit : > On August 9, WebApps published LCWD #2 of the Progress Events spec: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-progress-events-20110809/ Section 2.1: "If this is for some reason not possible prefix the extension in some way and start the prefix with an uppercase letter. E.g. if company Foo wants to add a private method bar() it could be named FooBar() to prevent clashes with a potential future standardized bar()." This sentence in hard to read and unclear. Please rephrase/fix it. Section 4.2: It should indicate what the requirements for other specifications are to define properly the use of these events. Section 4.3: Why aren't the names of events, and the instant and number of times they are dispatched, not normatively defined ? This would be beneficial for consistency in the web platform, wouldn't it? Regards, Cyril -- Cyril Concolato Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor Groupe Multimedia/Multimedia Group Telecom ParisTech 46 rue Barrault 75 013 Paris, France http://concolato.wp.institut-telecom.fr/
Received on Wednesday, 10 August 2011 07:36:15 UTC