W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: RfC: LCWD of Progress Events; deadline September 1

From: Cyril Concolato <cyril.concolato@telecom-paristech.fr>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 09:36:33 +0200
Message-ID: <4E423501.7050804@telecom-paristech.fr>
To: public-webapps@w3.org
Le 09/08/2011 19:34, Arthur Barstow a écrit :
> On August 9, WebApps published LCWD #2 of the Progress Events spec:
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-progress-events-20110809/
Section 2.1:
"If this is for some reason not possible prefix the extension in some way and start the prefix with an uppercase letter. E.g. if company Foo wants to add a private method bar() it could be named FooBar() to prevent clashes with a potential future standardized bar()."
This sentence in hard to read and unclear. Please rephrase/fix it.

Section 4.2:
It  should indicate what the requirements for other specifications are to define properly the use of these events.

Section 4.3:
Why aren't the names of events, and the instant and number of times they are dispatched, not normatively defined ? This would be beneficial for consistency in the web platform, wouldn't it?

Regards,
Cyril

-- 
Cyril Concolato
Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor
Groupe Multimedia/Multimedia Group
Telecom ParisTech
46 rue Barrault
75 013 Paris, France
http://concolato.wp.institut-telecom.fr/
Received on Wednesday, 10 August 2011 07:36:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:47 GMT