Re: Element.create(): a proposal for more convenient element creation

On 2011-08-08 11:34, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> ...
> First off, that's infinitely more work to support a rarely used
> feature than not supporting it at all.
>
> Second, since that notation isn't used anywhere else, it's a pretty
> big cost in brain print for users.
>
> So no, I wouldn't say it's cheap.
> ...

Well, it's cheap in that it needs no new API signature and uses a 
notation that is already well-established.

Best regards, Julian

Received on Monday, 8 August 2011 10:03:01 UTC