- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 17:21:54 -0500
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Cc: ext Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>
On 6 Jul 2011, at 2:41 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > Hi Hixie, > > On 7/6/11 1:55 PM, ext Ian Hickson wrote: >> On Tue, 5 Jul 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote: >>> Any comments re the priority of this bug, in particular if it must be >>> addressed before publishing a new LCWD? >> Can we please stop letting the LCWD/CR/PR process nonsense drive the >> prioritisation of the bug fixing process? This is getting ridiculous. > > I think we all realize you have issues with the W3C's TR process. I actually agree with some of your view points [at least as I understand them ;-)] and I think they should be discussed with a different set of people then WebApps. For instance, the so-called Advisory Board [AdvBrd] "manages the evolution of the W3C Process Document", yet I suspect very few of them are subscribed to public-webapps. > > So, rather than continuing to complain about this process on public-webapps, I would appreciate it if you would please move TR process type discussions to another Public list. > > IJ, PLH - what Public list is appropriate for discussions about the TR process? There is no list with a public archive. One thing to do is use process-issues and cc www-archive if you wish. Ian > > -AB > > [AdvBrd] http://www.w3.org/2002/ab/ > > > > -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ Tel: +1 718 260 9447
Received on Wednesday, 6 July 2011 22:22:04 UTC