W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2011

Re: Widgets - WARP, Widgets Updates and Digital Signatures

From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 18:37:05 +0000
Message-ID: <4D518D51.1080604@webr3.org>
To: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
CC: "Nilsson, Claes1" <Claes1.Nilsson@sonyericsson.com>, "Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com" <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com>, "public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Peter Dekkers <peter@jbaron.com>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
Nathan wrote:
> Marcos Caceres wrote:
>> On 9/16/10 6:10 PM, Nathan wrote:
>>> Marcos Caceres wrote:
>>>> As above. I thought that was what we (Web Apps WG - Widgets) have been
>>>> doing for the last 5 years?
>>>
>>> Maybe I've missed part of the specifications - are you telling me that I
>>> can package up an HTML,CSS,JS based application as per the widgets
>>> specification, include a WARP, Digital Signature, set the view-mode to
>>> windowed and that this will run as is, in the main browser context of
>>> the main browser vendors (Firefox, Safari, Opera, Chrome, IE etc)?
>>
>> Ah! ok. I get it now. No, that won't work right now (actually, that's 
>> how we run them in our development environment for testing purposes :) 
>> ). But that is trivial and no one has really asked for that.
> 
> Good to know, and you can consider me as asking for it!
> 
>> I'm still a bit lost as to what the use case is?

following up, see "Web Apps -- requirements for installation and 
management" from TimBL:

   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2011Feb/0078.html

Best,

Nathan
Received on Tuesday, 8 February 2011 18:39:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:43 GMT