- From: Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 18:02:35 -0400
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Cc: ext Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
A proposal,
Le 22 juin 2011 à 13:50, Arthur Barstow a écrit :
> participants: Candidate Recommendations require Director's approval and the decision to publish a Recommendation is subject to feedback from the entire W3C Membership (WebApps includes only 24 of the 325 W3C Members).
We usually never exit a phase but enter a phase in the W3C Process.
W3C Working Draft 08 February 2011
http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-webstorage-20110208/
The last Editor's Draft 21 June 2011
http://dev.w3.org/html5/webstorage/
Is there enough time, energy to produce an implementation report for the current spec features? Specifically from the people who have implemented it.
Opera has a simili implementation report
http://www.opera.com/docs/specs/presto29/webstorage/
with the explicit following mention
Opera Presto does not currently support:
Structured storage
Storage mutex
What about others?
It will help to see if there is work needed to reduce the specification, abandon it, etc.
--
Karl Dubost - http://dev.opera.com/
Developer Relations & Tools, Opera Software
Received on Wednesday, 22 June 2011 22:03:25 UTC