- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 22:35:33 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Kenneth Russell <kbr@google.com>
- cc: Travis Leithead <Travis.Leithead@microsoft.com>, "Jonas Sicking (jonas@sicking.cc)" <jonas@sicking.cc>, "gman@google.com" <gman@google.com>, "cmarrin@apple.com" <cmarrin@apple.com>, "glenn@zewt.org" <glenn@zewt.org>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Tue, 31 May 2011, Kenneth Russell wrote: > > Jonas's suggestion of adding another argument to postMessage, and > Gregg's generalization to declare it as an array of objects to be > transferred rather than copied, sounds good. We could change make MessagePort and ArrayBuffer both inherit from a [NoInterfaceObject] empty interface, and then make the MessagePort[] argument of the various postMessage() methods instead take an array of this new interface, and then just have ArrayBuffer and MessagePort both define how to be cloned in this way. If people like this approach I can work with Kenneth on getting the wording right in the various specs. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2011 22:35:56 UTC