W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2011

[Bug 12816] Make second argument in constructor an object for future extensibility

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 22:30:00 +0000
To: public-webapps@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1QRXRo-0003Xx-HI@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12816

Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
                 CC|                            |jonas@sicking.cc
         Resolution|INVALID                     |

--- Comment #2 from Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> 2011-05-31 22:29:59 UTC ---
It makes future expansions more consistent with current code. I.e. the API that
we'll have in the future will be a cleaner one.

The downside of course is if we don't add future arguments at all, then we've
created unnecessarily complex syntax.

But the list in [1] contains some fairly plausible properties.

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011AprJun/0732.html

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2011 22:30:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:45 GMT