- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 15:37:04 -0400
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>
- CC: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Apr/4/2011 2:20 AM, ext Ian Hickson wrote: > On Sat, 2 Apr 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote: >> Perhaps subscribers to both lists (Mike Smith, Maciej, Hixie) could >> provide some guidance on which list to use for Offline Web applications >> (again, I'm OK with public-webapps) and which Bugzilla product/component >> to use to file feature requests for Offline Web apps. > If one wants to send e-mail and be guaranteed a response, then the > whatwg@whatwg.org list will be most effective. > > If one wants to discuss the issue within the W3C context, then > public-html@w3.org is the list most appropriate for the current spec text. On Apr/4/2011 3:06 AM, ext Charles Pritchard wrote: > I'd prefer to see discussion continue on public-webapps . I'm not against cross posting. Since Offline Web applications is being specified by the HTML WG we should respect their request to use public-html for related discussions. I suspect most of us are generally opposed to cross posting. However, in this case, if there are no strong objections, my preference is for public-webapps to be cross-posted on discussions about Offline Web applications. -Art Barstow
Received on Monday, 4 April 2011 19:37:37 UTC