W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: How to standardize new Offline Web app features? [Was Re: Offline Web Applications status]

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 15:37:04 -0400
Message-ID: <4D9A1DE0.50304@nokia.com>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>
CC: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Apr/4/2011 2:20 AM, ext Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Apr 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>> Perhaps subscribers to both lists (Mike Smith, Maciej, Hixie) could
>> provide some guidance on which list to use for Offline Web applications
>> (again, I'm OK with public-webapps) and which Bugzilla product/component
>> to use to file feature requests for Offline Web apps.
> If one wants to send e-mail and be guaranteed a response, then the
> whatwg@whatwg.org list will be most effective.
> If one wants to discuss the issue within the W3C context, then
> public-html@w3.org is the list most appropriate for the current spec text.

On Apr/4/2011 3:06 AM, ext Charles Pritchard wrote:

 > I'd prefer to see discussion continue on public-webapps . I'm not 
against cross posting.

Since Offline Web applications is being specified by the HTML WG we 
should respect their request to use public-html for related discussions.

I suspect most of us are generally opposed to cross posting. However, in 
this case, if there are no strong objections, my preference is for 
public-webapps to be cross-posted on discussions about Offline Web 

-Art Barstow
Received on Monday, 4 April 2011 19:37:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:26:31 UTC