- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 06:20:58 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- cc: ext Michael Nordman <michaeln@google.com>, lrbabe@gmail.com, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Sat, 2 Apr 2011, Arthur Barstow wrote: > > Perhaps subscribers to both lists (Mike Smith, Maciej, Hixie) could > provide some guidance on which list to use for Offline Web applications > (again, I'm OK with public-webapps) and which Bugzilla product/component > to use to file feature requests for Offline Web apps. If one wants to send e-mail and be guaranteed a response, then the whatwg@whatwg.org list will be most effective. If one wants to discuss the issue within the W3C context, then public-html@w3.org is the list most appropriate for the current spec text. If one wants to file a bug and be guaranteed a response, then open the WHATWG HTML Standard, click on the relevant section, and type the comment in the feedback form at the bottom right. It'll automatically pick the right component and so forth. I don't remember what the component is called off-hand, probably "HTML spec" or some such. You can also file a bug using the form at the top of the W3C draft that the feature is defined in, which is currently the HTML5 draft; that should also pick the right component but doesn't give me as much context. You can also file the bug directly in Bugzilla if you can work out which component to use. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 4 April 2011 06:21:31 UTC